1. After 20+ years it's time to pass the torch. If you are interested in acquiring this forum please contact support@cv-performance.com for details. Any spam will be reported and blocked.
  2. Welcome to Bike Talk, a forum for all bikers and motorcycle enthusiasts. If you are new to Bike Talk, be sure to register for free and join the conversation.

    There's always someone around willing to help out with questions or give a friendly wave back. All Harley and metric riders are welcome.

performance exhaust

Discussion in 'Motorcycle Tech Talk' started by samvan, Mar 25, 2015.

  1. samvan

    samvan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    wichita,kansas
    what would be the better exhaust system on a harley 117 build, the boarzilla 2:1 or the rush stepped 3 2:1 ? just a opinion
  2. JohnnyBiker

    JohnnyBiker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Minnesota
    You have now opened thed the floodgates. Be ready for what's coming! Welcome to bike-talk.
  3. JohnnyBiker

    JohnnyBiker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Minnesota
    In all seriousness, are these the only choices? Personally, I would choose a stepped pipe over a non stepped pipe.
  4. hotroadking

    hotroadking Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    13,682
    Likes Received:
    584
    Location:
    Mouseville USA
    Depends on the tune, the cams, and how it's built
    different pipes cause the bike to react differently

    Boarzilla is a big pipe, very very loud and cool looking.
    either should do well, I'd opt for a supertrapp though
    so it's tuneable.
  5. Lucifer

    Lucifer Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    3,861
    Likes Received:
    102
    Location:
    Cape Breton NS,Canada
  6. baggerpaul

    baggerpaul Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,670
    Likes Received:
    108
    Location:
    south fl.
    Well it all depends on how you would like the power band to be and what cam and head package you have?more information please we don't have a crystal ball. And what year and model bike you have this motor in would be nice also .
  7. samvan

    samvan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    wichita,kansas
    the 117 build was a 107 with 123 hp & 126 tq. stage 4 hds w/bottom end, tranny & clutch upgrade & 662-1 cams along with v&h true dual hi outputs. upgrading cc & cams
  8. samvan

    samvan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    wichita,kansas
    oh yes 2011 street glide
  9. baggerpaul

    baggerpaul Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,670
    Likes Received:
    108
    Location:
    south fl.
    Well if your running those kind of # I don't think your gonna see much difference with an exhaust change those are some very good numbers for a 117 .must be some very good heads and you must be running a 2 inch min intake and a 1.600 exhaust valve if not larger .if I was going to put on an exhaust on a motor that size I would try the fuel motor 2 into 1 e series pipe fully tunable and will make power all around the curve .you have a stout 117 with a great combo of parts to make those numbers .I would have a hard time making a change.
  10. JohnnyBiker

    JohnnyBiker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Do you like that Tman cam? I am in the process of building a 117 and have considered that cam but have opted for a different one.
  11. samvan

    samvan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    wichita,kansas
    Those #''s are on my 107 at the present time. Had it bored to 107 before the bike had 3 miles on it. (123 hp / 126 tq ) with the 107 build and V&H true dual hi outputs The 117 should be ready this week. Was seeking input on a 2:1 exhaust system. You are right, those are good #'s for true duals, curious whether 2:1 could have done better as have been suggested.
  12. samvan

    samvan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    wichita,kansas
    The 662-1 is the cam in the 107 build. worked dawn good for me, I posted the #'s going with 662-3 with 117.
  13. samvan

    samvan Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    85
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    wichita,kansas
    Definitely looking to improve on those #'s with the 117 build. My curiosity is, is the 2:1 always the better performance pipe. The true duals served me well as the #'s indicate with the 107 build.
  14. JohnnyBiker

    JohnnyBiker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Minnesota
    The answer to that question is relative to a lot of other variables. If you have a good stepped true dual, it can out perform a 2:1 pipe. A lot of it depends on your desire of where you prefer to ride. (Rpm range). 2:1 systems tend to be more efficient to left of the curve as the true dials tend to be more efficient to the right of the curve.

    What is your intended use for this 117?
  15. JohnnyBiker

    JohnnyBiker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Minnesota
    This cam is right handed. If it were me, I would stay with true duals.
  16. baggerpaul

    baggerpaul Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2011
    Messages:
    2,670
    Likes Received:
    108
    Location:
    south fl.
    Well you better have some serious compression to run the -3 .268 degree of duration and a close of 61 degree on the exhaust that cam is designed to blow off a lot of cylinder pressure and come on way late in the rpm that's a right side cam and on a heavy bike will feel lazy .so set the 117 at 12.0 to 12.5 .
  17. JohnnyBiker

    JohnnyBiker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Minnesota
    He said that it is about ready to go. More specific build details would be nice huh?
  18. hotroadking

    hotroadking Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    13,682
    Likes Received:
    584
    Location:
    Mouseville USA
    well if he's running 12 to 1 he's not gonna be on pump gas or riding to sturgis on
    low octane corn fuel
  19. JohnnyBiker

    JohnnyBiker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2010
    Messages:
    9,568
    Likes Received:
    205
    Location:
    Minnesota
    If he is set at 12:1 static his ball park corrected is what about 10.25:1 to 10.5:1 assuming standard hi performance set up? Pushing it for pump gas but doable.
  20. hotroadking

    hotroadking Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    13,682
    Likes Received:
    584
    Location:
    Mouseville USA
    I've run it high, a super hot summer time high comp engine doesn't like anything but super, and it will knock on that as well.

    Best to give up a bit of power for reliability and rideability...

    Having a ride to fix , fix to ride bike isn't fun
    kickstand68, samvan and Lucifer like this.

Share This Page