Gun Control

OK you carry and like guns so I'm not pickin on ya but the comment isn't making sense to me, it's illogical, at least from my persective so I'm just gonna lay out some stuff ok?

So in a sense you feel in some way that the "type" gun is to blame for the actions, either in part or completely, for if this gun did not exist, or any guns like it, crimes with these type of guns would cease to happen.

BTW the LA boys had full autos, completely illegal, laws prohibit them everywhere unless you have Class III license, have been approved by BATF for the fully auto, and even more, CA law prohibited the bank robber from having large capacity magazines, a step further, it's illegal to shoot in public, rob a bank, kill people, shoot at cops.

So how was it possible the LA boys did what they did? I mean
the stuff was banned!

See my point? Restricting or banning the item does nothing to stop the criminal or insane from doing something,

How about this, you cannot be raped unless a penis is involved ergo penis's are the tool, and therefore all penis must be banned from use except for procreation or relief of bladder. Otherwise all penis's must be removed, kept in a secure safe, and only taken out for reproductive purposes, and you must apply for a permit to do so, of course there will be a limit on length, width and amount of uses.

I do support an IQ test for penis reproductive use... :roflmao:

It's still semi auto for sale to the public and no different than Colts, S&W or others used of legal legitimate use in target shooting, plinking, competition, home defense, general shooting and hunting. If you don't use one for those purposes than you probably don't need one. They have along with other guns have been flying off the shelves of gun stores. I do believe that every gun owner should keep their guns locked in a safe especially with children in the house.

So now you are calling me stupid, that was below the belt dude and taken personal don't do that again. We don't resort to that here.

Well that's a pretty solid logical retort...

You know we don't think less of ya, my point was to show how
blaming the item for the carnage has become the prototypical response
of people and there is some logic in the reasoning,

When you consider that you cannot in this case take action against
the kid or mother because they are both dead people feel they need to
take some kind of action or they feel powerless. In this case they are misdirected
into taking the tool or object and placing their anger or ire, it's called transference, when you can't take out your anger on the one you are mad at, you focus it on someone else or something else.

If this kid had blown the school up with fertilizer and diesel fuel
in a 5 gallon can, would you be callng for the banning of 5 gallon buckets
or registration of the sale of fertilizer, permits for diesel gas purchase

Of course not, you'd realize the act was done by an insane person
and the argument would be on the real subject, after the press tore
apart his family, the history, and degraded his family on tv for all to see
we'd agree he was nuts and nothing would have stopped him.

But it's a gun he used and by god it's the problem..

My statement was legit and I am not stupid or is my statement and resent your name calling. There has been in the past many who have even tried banning black powder guns because of the access to black powder and explosive making material, so rethink your comment.

Yeah I do LOL it's friggin fun, expensive but fun.

I prefer to look at want to and my right to vs need to, I don't need a gun at all I don't need to go to the range at all, I don't need my sig 522 full tactical 22 LR, don't need all the other Iv'e got,

In reality a 5 shot 38 wheel guns all you need
or a kel-tec pocket rocket 380...

My point is I'm not illegal, I don't go around doing illegal things
with my guns, so why restrict me based on the actions of someone
else.

Well I just picked up a another gun today. All the AR style guns sold out even the ones around 1700. Picked up a extended clip to. The wait is real long today, phone lines are jammed with guys and gals buying guns. The place was so packed you hardly had a place to stand. The news media was in there filming and interviewing . Guy asked me and told him no interview and shut the camera off. I told him he better keep his story positive and no negative crap. He said he got permission from the shop owner.

I am not going to argue with anyone on here anymore or other places about my second amendment right as it is mine and other Americans right to own any legal firearm that we choose to. That is our 2nd amendment right.
I went back after 3 hours and they were just finishing mine up. Piles and piles of new guns in bags and boxes waiting to be picked up. I watched several guys buying M&P, AR15, the Bushmaster like the one used in the school shooting buying with Cash. People are really worried BO is going to restrict their constitutional right. There were women in the gun shop today buying guns, its their right to. The banning of these rifles based on there look is bull. I think BO is feeling pressure now from several anti gun groups and probably feeling the need to stop violence. Where is the right answer well that is another discussion.