1. After 20+ years it's time to pass the torch. If you are interested in acquiring this forum please contact support@cv-performance.com for details. Any spam will be reported and blocked.
  2. Welcome to Bike Talk, a forum for all bikers and motorcycle enthusiasts. If you are new to Bike Talk, be sure to register for free and join the conversation.

    There's always someone around willing to help out with questions or give a friendly wave back. All Harley and metric riders are welcome.

Is buying a car getting political

Discussion in 'Pull up a chair and sit for a spell' started by amf4399, May 16, 2009.

  1. Sleepy

    Sleepy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,665
    Likes Received:
    73
    Wow!!!.....normally I wouldn't comment and I probably shouldn't now seeing that it's the UAW and not the CAW which is the Certified Bargaining Agent up here. The Pension Plan should be a separate entity from the business and the plan members should be entitled to the provisions laid out in the plan. There may be some language dealing with bankruptcy and a partial or total windup of the plan. I'm not sure of the funding requirements for PP's south of the 49th but there rules up this way to ensure plan solvency, five years being the standard for now. The global crisis may see some changes to give planholders more time to top up the funds. A Defined Benefit is a "promise" Should a plan "wind Up" the members are first in line. This deal is for GM and Chryco..to sustain the "business" per se. The problems funding the PP's existed long before the financial meltdown of the past year, when interst rates were high, the sponsors took a "holiday" as the interest covered the funding requirements The obligation should be on the plan sponsor to ensure solvency for the members, irresepective of whether or not bankruptcy is declared. OB is trying to take the politically correct way out. I feel bad for the investor.....I've had my portfolio take a ****kicking over the past while but an investor invests knowing the risks...up this way at least, no promises made ..but a member of a defined benefit plan has been given a promise.
    I too am a Bowtie Guy but there's a Mustang in my garage right now. Ford was a bit more proactive a couple of years ago when they saw trouble coming and they went through a really tough time.good on Ford. I won't hold it against you for being a management person..a guy's gotta eat and I know that you don't hate me for using a gavel to chair a meeting...we'll all get thru this.
  2. hotroadking

    hotroadking Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    13,682
    Likes Received:
    584
    Location:
    Mouseville USA
    Promise isn't a guarantee

    Pension benefit plans are not secured lending assets

    Bonds, Stocks, Secured lenders all were shoved under the rug by Obama and his desire to take over the Auto Companies. That way he can control what is made and he can control votes.

    The UAW is not a secured lender to the auto company
    The employees pensions are backed by the US gov't just like bank account balances.

    What Obama did was loan money to the companies, then as the lender, forgave the loan for stock, then to keep the UAW retirees, who are killing GM , Ford and Chrysler with huge legacy costs from going under and tapping the Govt pension backing funds, he gave them controlling interest, over companies and individuals with secured bonds and notes.

    GM and Chrysler should have filed bankruptcy in the normal courts, The UAW contracts would be gone, basically the UAW would be gone. The debts restructured into payable debts over time to lenders, who, over time would emerge from bankruptcy and be leaner, cleaner and able to compete.

    Now they are government owned companies, a shame, a sham and run by the most corrupt people in the world, politicians.. Right or left...


    While it might sound like the thing to do, protect the retired, non working non contributing non workers pensioners, he basically told creditors, 'when the us govt gets involved, we can do whatever we want to your debt, including wiping it out"

    The crux of it will be the failure of these companies to obtain structured financing to create new products, buy materials, pay payroll, build new factories because no lender will loan money knowing his secuirty is worthless.

    Go try and borrow $20K from your bank, unsecured, tell them you want to buy something with it, car, bike, you're not sure what you are going to buy but you'd like the loan first.

    Promises are not guarantees.
    Last edited: May 22, 2009
  3. Sleepy

    Sleepy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,665
    Likes Received:
    73
    Can't argue with your post in regards to the buyouts nor the politics behind it. The only two things guaranteed are death and taxes. I'm not certain on exactly how the government backs defined benefit PP's and private bank accounts down your way. Up here accounts are covered up to a max of 100,000 now I believe. Federally regulated PP's are somewhat covered. CAW members in the auto industry are not covered so they would fall under the provincial regulations and the master text of the PP. The assets of the plan not in consideration should the company go bankrupt. Should the plan be in surplus this surplus would be in consideration provided that it does not effect the plan members negatively.
    I hate to say it but they probably should have gone under and restructured under Chapter 11. Air Canada did that a few years ago. One of the reasons they weren't bought was because of their PP. Air Canada isn't out of the woods yet.
    I share your cynacism in the government controlling the companies. We went through this a number of years ago where the government paid way more than market value and after a number of years ..and countless tax dollars getting the business to be profitable they sold it for cents on the dollar to some "lucky" business.
    I have also seen some businesses bought up for the assets in the PP ..[not lately mind you] and the business shut down. Might be a good way of making money but I'm not fond of that practice.
    The automakers are looking at a two tiered system. I believe they have two wage tables already. They may want to look at Winding Up the PP and start from scratch going forward and maybe have a more affordable cost structure.
    It's a shame that it all has to come to this but as bad as the north american taxpayer is getting bit by the buyout I'm more upset with the way the bank buyouts were handled..but that's another story and I won't get into it here..I promise
  4. hotroadking

    hotroadking Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    13,682
    Likes Received:
    584
    Location:
    Mouseville USA
    I agree on the bailouts.

    Now we have a political run or State Auto Maker

    Hmmm Russia has a state auto company...

    We need to be careful trying to "fix" everything the market will fix the problems it always has, when govt steps in its JMO two steps back...
  5. mwelych

    mwelych Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,211
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Except for when I was younger and broke, I have always bought Jeep and will continue too... GM is about ready to go belly up too...:)
  6. amf4399

    amf4399 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Baltimore MD.
    I haven't found the actual written report but they were talking about it on the radio yesterday and we should hear more about it soon. It seems at least some dealerships were shut down because they were big republican contributors and others were saved because they were Obama supporters. If true I hope Dodge goes down the tubes. It looks like GM may be repeating the mistake.
  7. hotroadking

    hotroadking Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    13,682
    Likes Received:
    584
    Location:
    Mouseville USA
    Regardless
    Gm will take a nose dive,
    Bondholders are refusing to give in

    Obama will step in and screw them in the ground again like he did on Chrysler and give it to the UAW

    People think the pension people (UAW) are the only ones that loose income on this.

    Folks need to understand that a lot of the Bondholders are individuals that sunk life savings into GM or Chrylser Bonds and lived off the interest payment, it's not simply huge investment houses that owned bonds.

    But these are not Union members that can be counted on for Democratic votes so Obama tosses them under the bus and wipes out their investments.

    It's wrong.... Bondholders have a secured position, this will drive the bond market away from capitalizing industry in the USA, and that means the end of industry as we know it...
  8. FLHTbiker

    FLHTbiker Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    18,516
    Likes Received:
    252
    Location:
    Oregon
    Yea, and there is another Japanese dealer moving into the Ford store that closed up and a Toyota dealer opening up a new dealer on the same road about a mile down. The Japs will take over for sure and I for one will never own a Japanese car or truck.
  9. hotroadking

    hotroadking Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    Messages:
    13,682
    Likes Received:
    584
    Location:
    Mouseville USA
    hopefully the bondholders wised up and take GMs better offer, because if they don't Obama will seize the company and governmentize it.

    Then bondholders are fubard

    Did you see where his administration is talking about limiting salary for not only TARP companies but Public companies as well?

    Excuse me but I though the USA was the land of Opportunity, not the land of the oppressed...
  10. FLHTbiker

    FLHTbiker Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    18,516
    Likes Received:
    252
    Location:
    Oregon
    I think sense he feels he is the US President that he can do anything he wants and unfortunately so far he is getting what he wants.

    We are screwed :( :(
  11. amf4399

    amf4399 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2008
    Messages:
    350
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Baltimore MD.
    Hummer being bought by the Chinese. Ouch that hurts. Ford sales are up. Never really been a Ford fan but I am now.
  12. FLHTbiker

    FLHTbiker Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2004
    Messages:
    18,516
    Likes Received:
    252
    Location:
    Oregon
    Like Chevy, the wife and I have owned a few Fords and we liked them. I still say that her Ford Taurus saved her life when she was involved in a really bad accident (caused by a Mex.). That car was twisted and turned but held together where she was. Her 02 Impala has 101000 miles on it now, still running good and looks good, gets 32 on the highway so why buy a new one.

Share This Page